Of the 66 instances, 38 were negative (58%) for a total loss of 62% (average loss of -0.93% per instance). The chart below shows the equity curve of the hypothetical trade back through December 1997 (about 2,500 trading days):

In spite of the average loss over the period in its entirety, you can see how the trade was actually positive on balance during the heavy upward momentum "bubble" period through the Spring of 2000 before it devolved into a pattern of sharp-bounce breakdowns during the bear market period that ensued.
This month is typically bullish and has brought relatively good news. The Federal Reserve's decision next week will certainly dominate trading for the rest of the month. While many of the major indices are back at prior highs (save the subject of this study), volatility has increased significantly since this past summer, not unlike the 2000 transition period.
At the end of the day, how you view this study thus likely depends on which type of environment you believe we are in.
UPDATE: For a good second interpretation of the recent surge, read this TraderFeed article on new highs. I always advocate looking at multiple indicators to get a true read on the market. Price is just one, and as you can see above, in this instance its interpretation is indeterminate.


2 comments:
Well, wasn't that interesting... turned out to be a timely article!
To wrap this one up, in this instance the NDX was down about 2.8% five days after the post. Sometime statistics such as these can identify good times to hedge with options, if not go all out short, if that is your cup of tea.
Post a Comment